Arizonans Have Not Perceived Much Pressure For or Against Pandemic Protocols

 

News reports and breathless opinion pieces on both the right and left have painted a pretty bleak picture of social conflict during the pandemic. This seems to have subsided by now, but man, in 2020 and 2021 things were hot.

We heard about people being attacked with hammers for wearing masks and others being confronted while shopping for not wearing masks. Workers at vaccine clinics have been attacked and called murderers. Workers asking for proof of vaccination have been attacked too.

With all of this attacking going on, you'd be forgiven for thinking there is nowhere to hide from pressure to follow—or not follow—pandemic mitigation protocols. But there is new data suggesting that this impression is not a true picture of how things are, in Arizona anyway.

CoVHORT is a research project on COVID-19 being conducted by the University of Arizona. It is longitudinal, meaning it collects data at multiple points over a long period, using the same participants. CoVHORT has just over 8000 Arizonans enrolled, including me (if you'd like to participate click here).

They occasionally release infographics sharing their results. The other day they sent an email sharing results about perceived severity of the disease in those infected, and the amount of pressure people felt to conform or not conform with mitigation measures.

This is their graphic on perceived severity:


I would by default expect this to be "normally distributed," i.e. fitting under a bell-shaped curve. I was surprised to see the low percentages in the high severity levels. The distribution is also bi-modal, meaning it has two high-points, and it has an average below the middle. For most Arizonans who were infected, COVID-19 apparently wasn't all that bad. 

The email also contained results about the pressure Arizonans reported feeling in favor of and against adhering to COVID protocols at work and in personal/social interaction. They presented this data using pie charts, in my opinion not the best choice for making comparisons. So I reworked their results like so:


Given all the news accounts I've seen like those reported above I was surprised to see so little evidence of perceived pressure. Except for pro-protocol pressure in personal/social life, large majorities perceived no pressure at all. 

Both for and against skewed higher in personal/social life than at work, maybe because so many people have been working remotely. The most pressure appears to be for protocols in personal/social life. There was more pressure for pandemic protocols than against, again something I did not expect given what I've seen in the news.

This makes me realize I may be a victim of availability bias, in which people form impressions based on evidence that comes most easily to mind. Maybe I've been consuming too many aggressive COVIDiot stories. Thanks, science!







Popular posts from this blog

Looks Like Immune Responses are Enduring After All

Image
 For some time, public health officials have fretted about whether immunity to COVID-19, acquired via infection or vaccination would stick.  Studies showed rapid declines in antibodies during recovery from infection and thereafter . It turns out that this concern was overblown. A study just released says bone marrow plasma cells are a persistent source of protective antibodies, and that "circulating resting memory B cells directed against the S protein were detected in the convalescent individuals."   Another study , yet to be reviewed, suggests that vaccines boost this effect. In fact, some are suggesting this situation this could actually mean  lifetime immunity .   Whether the same thing happens with vaccination is not clear. Most estimates suggest that vaccine immunity will last about a year . More pessimistic estimates putting the protection period at six months .  The possible shorter time frame, plus the appearance of the new variants, ha...
Read more

Another One Bites the Dust

Image
Hi all. Stepping out of retirement for a moment to say that the day has finally arrived. After four years of successfully avoiding COVID-19 infection I had a positive test yesterday. Symptoms are very mild—I've had worse colds. The provider at urgent care said almost all the cases they are seeing are the same. Mild symptoms may also be due to the fact that I had the original vaccine then the two boosters. All this time I thought I might be a NOVID —one of those people who never get the bug. But no, it must have been my assiduous mask wearing and avoidance of high-risk situations when things were bad. So here's double middle fingers to all the kooks who think masks don't work (I've not been wearing masks for months now). I don't know what variant I have but it's likely JN.1. It is said to be extraordinarily contagious and accounts for 60% of cases worldwide . It also tends to produce mild infections like the one I have.  This article claims that right now every...
Read more

Happy Inject Yourself with Bleach Day!

Image
  It's hard to believe, but it was two years ago today that our moron of a former president took to a news conference to share his awesome ideas about how to combat COVID-19 infections. He suggested we inject the victims with disinfectant, and put "powerful lights" inside their bodies (somehow) to cure them. Here is a  Sarah Cooper mime  of the performance in case you've forgotten how cringe-worthy it was. His poor pandemic expert Dr. Deborah Birx stood next to him, looking on in horror. She has since said that she didn't say anything at the time because her military background taught her to never make her commander look bad in public. Maybe that's a good reason not to have ex-military people in positions like hers. I say that because when a president says something ignorant there are plenty of gullible people who will take it seriously. Like the people who actually misted their body with, inhaled vapors of, gargled with, or drank cleaning products because o...
Read more